This draft report to US Congress, produced by the Center for Environmental Quality (CEQ) is full of things we don't know and aren't doing adequetly. Read for yourself; it's not good news but at least in knowing what we need to be changed, we have a better chance of improving.
Read it for yourself here.
Rpt.Congress3.18.11.pdf
I welcome opinions on the matter.
AP
Water Saving Products
Showing posts with label clean water act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clean water act. Show all posts
Friday, April 8, 2011
Friday, April 1, 2011
Are you kidding me?
Well here is another fine example of big business having its way with the US House. I cant imagine that members of the House of Representatives truly believe that lessening restrictions on pesticide use is a step in the right direction. I see it as exactly the opposite! Exempting farmers and companies use of pesticides, on or near water, from complying with the EPA Clean Water Act amounts to turning a blind eye at a time when we need to see improvements in fresh water resource preservation efforts. I certainly hope the Senate has the decency and presence to pull the plug on this effort.
This isn't the first time this has been argued by the EPA on behalf of the pesticide industry. In Jan 2009, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an earlier EPA decision that pesticide use "should not" fall under the Clean Water Act passed in 1972. The court ruled that "pesticides constituted pollutants under federal law and thereby had to be regulated to protect public health and the environment". The rule excluding pesticides was put into place by the Bush administration; no surprise there.
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9MAEE4O1.htm
http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/04/conservationists_applauded_the.html
What do you think?
AP
www.AskAquaPro.com
AquaPro@AskaquaPro.com
www.AquaEnvi.org
This isn't the first time this has been argued by the EPA on behalf of the pesticide industry. In Jan 2009, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed an earlier EPA decision that pesticide use "should not" fall under the Clean Water Act passed in 1972. The court ruled that "pesticides constituted pollutants under federal law and thereby had to be regulated to protect public health and the environment". The rule excluding pesticides was put into place by the Bush administration; no surprise there.
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9MAEE4O1.htm
http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/04/conservationists_applauded_the.html
What do you think?
AP
www.AquaEnvi.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)