Thursday, August 19, 2010

Peak Water is so much more troubling than Peak Oil could ever be


Those of us that are concerned about climate change and the effects being experienced around the globe, have heard about and understand the alarm being sounded about Peak Oil. People that are really paying attention to the global crisis are also aware of an even greater concern to humanity; Peak Water. 

It's not hard to to understand why Peak Oil gets so much more attention than Peak Water; any guesses? The obvious answer should be money!  More specifically how much corporations profit from oil vs water.  

Water is at level two in what I have tagged "The Trinity of Human Existence": Air, Water, Food. Everything else is irrelevant without the Trinity. 

Due to an explosion in world population, human demand for freshwater already exceeded supply capabilities in many parts of the world; and as the human population continues to rise at an unprecedented rate, the demand grows with it and  many more areas are expected to experience this imbalance in the immediate future. The status-quot is unsustaianable.

Agriculture represents 70% of freshwater use worldwid. The United States accounts for approximately 5% of the world's population, yet the US uses almost as much water as India (~1/5th of world population) or China (1/5th of world population). The industrial sector in the United States consumes more water than the agricultural sector. Currently in the U.S. there are 36 states  in some form of water stress, ranging from serious to severe.

The Ogallala Aquifer in the southern high plains of Texas and New Mexico is being drawn down at a rate that far exceeds replenishment. Portions of the aquifer will not naturally recharge due to layers of clay between the surface and the water-bearing formation. The term fossil water is used to describe aquifers that are not sustainable because the recharge rate is extremely slow. The
Ogallala Aquifer primarily consists of Fossil Water.

In California, massive amounts of groundwater are being sucked out of the Central Valley groundwater aquifers—unreported, unmonitored, and unregulated. California's Central Valley is home to one sixth of all U.S. irrigated land, and the state leads the nation in agricultural production and exports. This can have major implications for the U.S. economy.

The Central Arizona Project (CAP) is a 336-mile (541 km) long canal that diverts 489 billion gallons a year from the Colorado River to irrigate more than 300,000 acres (1,200 km2) of farmland. The CAP project also provides drinking water for Phoenix and Tucson. It has been estimated that Lake Mead, which dams the Colorado and supplies fresh water to more than 10 million people, is expected to run dry within the next 10 years.

The Ipswich River near Boston now runs dry in some years due to heavy pumping of groundwater for irrigation. Maryland, Virginia and the District have been fighting over the Potomac River. In drought years like 1999 or 2003, and on hot summer days the region consumes up to 85 percent of the river's flow.

Nine of the ten fastest-growing counties in the 15 months following Census 2000 (April 1, 2000) were in the South: three in Texas, three in Georgia, one in Virginia, one in Kentucky, and one in Florida.


Peak Water will be the primary cause of unrest and human suffering during the next century; if we continue too neglect the situation.

Listen to the children have to say- and then let me know what you think about the situation.



Opinions please; the subject is so worth your time and requires discussion & action NOW!


AP
www.AskAquaPro.com  
AquaPro@AskaquaPro.com 
www.AquaEnvi.org 
www.AquaProSolutions.com
www.AshevilleGreenPlumbing.com

ENVIRO-NEWS

New EPA Office of Water Web Site

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Makuch, Joseph" <Joseph.Makuch@ars.usda.gov>
Date: Aug 19, 2010 10:38 AM
Subject: [ENVIRO-NEWS] New EPA Office of Water Web Site
To: <Enviro-News@ars.usda.gov>

-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Han [mailto:han.amy@epamail.epa.gov]
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 4:47 PM
Subject: [waterheadlines] Water Headlines for the week of August 16,
2010
[deletions]

New Office of Water Web Site

On August 12, EPA's Office of Water (OW) launched its redesigned
website, http://water.epa.gov , replacing four OW content areas on
www.epa.gov. Information is now organized by topic in a way that should
be more straight-forward and useful to visitors. Visitors to the agency
site looking for water-related content will be redirected to appropriate
pages on the new OW site.
[deletions]

***********************************************
Enviro-News is a service of the Water Quality
Information Center at the National Agricultural
Library. The center's Web site is at
http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/.

The Enviro-News list facilitates information exchange.
Inclusion of an item in Enviro-News does not imply
United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) agreement,
nor does USDA attest to the accuracy or completeness of
the item. See
http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/environews.shtml#disclaimer
You can contact the list owner at
owner-Enviro-News@ars.usda.gov.
***********************************************

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

ENVIRO-NEWS

The Effects of Mountaintop Mines and Valley Fills on Aquatic Ecosystems of the Central Appalachian Coalfields

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Makuch, Joseph" <Joseph.Makuch@ars.usda.gov>
Date: Aug 18, 2010 1:32 PM
Subject: [ENVIRO-NEWS] The Effects of Mountaintop Mines and Valley Fills on Aquatic Ecosystems of the Central Appalachian Coalfields
To: <Enviro-News@ars.usda.gov>

-----Original Message-----
From: EPA Federal Register [mailto:envsubset@epa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:06 AM
Subject: [epafr-all] Table of Contents August 18, 2010
[deletions]

RESEARCH
-----------

The Effects of Mountaintop Mines and Valley Fills on Aquatic Ecosystems
of the Central Appalachian Coalfields, etc., 51058

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-20466.htm

[deletions]

***********************************************
Enviro-News is a service of the Water Quality
Information Center at the National Agricultural
Library. The center's Web site is at
http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/.

The Enviro-News list facilitates information exchange.
Inclusion of an item in Enviro-News does not imply
United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) agreement,
nor does USDA attest to the accuracy or completeness of
the item. See
http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/environews.shtml#disclaimer
You can contact the list owner at
owner-Enviro-News@ars.usda.gov.
***********************************************

ENVIRO-NEWS

EPA Climate Change and Water News

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Makuch, Joseph" <Joseph.Makuch@ars.usda.gov>
Date: Aug 18, 2010 11:48 AM
Subject: [ENVIRO-NEWS] EPA Climate Change and Water News
To: <Enviro-News@ars.usda.gov>

From: water_climate_change@epa.gov [mailto:water_climate_change@epa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 5:31 PM
Subject: EPA Climate Change and Water News

EPA Climate Change and Water News

EPA News

EPA to Co-Host the 2010 State-EPA Innovation Symposium:  Environmental
Protection for a Changing Climate and Greener Economy on November 1 - 4,
2010 in Madison, Wisconsin
EPA and its State partners are co-hosting the 2010 State-EPA Innovation
Symposium:  Environmental Protection for a Changing Climate and Greener
Economy on November 1 - 4, 2010 in Madison, Wisconsin.  Symposium
participants will have an opportunity to network, learn, and dialogue
about what changes in climate and moves toward more sustainable business
practices mean for the work of environmental agency personnel.  Plenary
speakers and breakout sessions will focus on:  The Making of a Greener
Economy- Emerging Issues and What They Mean for Our Work; Collaborating
for Co-Benefits- Engaging Partners to Maximize Results; and From Climate
to Classic Programs- New Tools and Strategies.  For additional
information, visit:  http://environmental-symposium.org/index.html.

EPA Announced Nearly $30 Million in Grants to Restore and Protect Puget
Sound
EPA announced nearly $30 million dollars in federal grants to help
protect and restore Puget Sound.  The funds are the latest infusion of
federal dollars in an ongoing effort to address decades of industrial
contamination, urban pollution and habitat alteration in Puget Sound.
The grants are geared towards tribal projects, watershed projects, and
outreach and education initiatives.  EPA received over 100 grant
applications for this round of grants. The grants cover a wide range of
projects including removing invasive species from watersheds, improving
salmon migration and increasing fish population, protecting watersheds
from the impacts of urban growth, reopening shellfish beds, purchasing
and preserving critical habitat and watershed lands, funding research to
track progress, protecting shorelines, and educating communities,
homeowners and students about reducing impacts to Puget Sound.
The grant recipients include Washington State, Tribes and local
governments, many of which will work directly with communities and
homeowners on projects to restore and protect Puget Sound.  The
Suquamish Tribe is receiving a grant worth nearly $600,000 for a project
that will restore the Chico Creek estuary, which will result in improved
fish passage and water quality in shellfish growing areas.  The State
and grantees are together matching dollar for dollar the $30 million
grant announced.  Every year, millions of pounds of toxic pollution
enter Puget Sound.  Since 2006, EPA has dedicated $58.4 million dollars
to protecting and restoring Puget Sound.  Link to interactive map of
grants:
http://www.epa.gov/region10/map/funding/pugetsound_funding_map.html.

Other News
The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Releases the 2009 State of the Climate Report
The 2009 State of the Climate Report is a comprehensive appraisal of
Earth's climate by more than 300 authors from 48 countries and portrays
all aspects of the climate system.  Observations span the atmosphere,
land, and ocean from the poles to the equator, and confirm that the past
decade was the warmest on record and that the Earth has been growing
warmer over the last 50 years. The report, summary, and supplemental
materials are available at:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/bams-state-of-the-climate/2009.php

Union of Concerned Scientists Hosting Webinars on America's Climate
Choices:  Informing Effective Responses to Climate Change and Adapting
to Its Impacts
On August 17, 2010 from 1-2 p.m. EDT, Dr. Diana Liverman will present
the findings in Informing an Effective Response to Climate Change, which
focuses on climate change information needs, information systems, and
communications.  Dr. Liverman is co-director of the Institute of the
Environment, University of Arizona and Senior Research Fellow at the
Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University.  On August 23, 2010
from 2-3 p.m. EDT, Dr. Thomas Wilbanks of Oak Ridge National Laboratory
will present the main findings of Adapting to the Impacts of Climate
Change.  He will be joined by Dr. Gary Yohe, Professor.  To register and
for more information visit:
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/what_you_can_do/ACC-Informing.html
.

The National Weather Service (NWS) Draft Strategic Plan is Available for
Public Comment Through September 7, 2010
The NWS draft Strategic Plan is ready for review and public comment
through September 7, 2010.  The draft plan represents the strategic
framework that will guide the NWS over the next ten years. The NWS
strategy will prepare NWS to meet the challenges and opportunities of
the future, while continuing to deliver today's mission and expanding to
meet the growing needs of the country.  For additional information,
visit:  www.weather.gov/com/stratplan. To provide comments, visit:
http://nwsstratplan.ideascale.com/

Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) to Host Webinar: One
Plant's Journey to Sustainable, Energy-Neutral Performance, and How You
Can Benefit on August 25, 2010 from 2 - 3 p.m. EDT
Over the course of decade, plant managers at the Strass Wastewater
Treatment Plant near Innsbruck, Austria made steady gains in the amount
of electricity produced and in overall energy efficiency of the
treatment process.  By 2005, the plant was producing more energy than it
required for treatment.  WERF developed a conceptual tool to optimize
carbon, heat, and energy pathways in wastewater treatment based on
Strass' experience.  WERF's researchers will demonstrate this tool,
which allows plants to benchmark their individual processes against
those of the global leaders in wastewater treatment.  The tool
highlights areas in the plant where the largest potential gains in
energy efficiency, energy production, and sustainability can be made.
For additional information, visit:
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/570122601.


EPA Climate Change and Water News is produced by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). For more information on EPA's
climate change activities, visit http://epa.gov/climatechange.  For an
overview of climate change and water issues, visit
http://www.epa.gov/ow/climatechange.


***********************************************
Enviro-News is a service of the Water Quality
Information Center at the National Agricultural
Library.  The center's Web site is at
http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/.

The Enviro-News list facilitates information exchange.
Inclusion of an item in Enviro-News does not imply
United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) agreement,
nor does USDA attest to the accuracy or completeness of
the item. See
http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/environews.shtml#disclaimer
You can contact the list owner at
owner-Enviro-News@ars.usda.gov.
***********************************************

Thursday, August 5, 2010

EPA allows pesticides to be applied to water.

Pesticides can be sprayed or added directly into or near bodies of water to control mosquito larvae and weeds, without special permitting under the Clean Water Act. On November 21 2006, the U.S. EPA finalized that decision, which affects both direct and airborne pesticide applications to water.

www.AskAquaPro.com  
AquaPro@AskaquaPro.com 
www.AquaEnvi.org
www.AquaProSolutions.com
www.AshevilleGreenPlumbing.com

Monday, August 2, 2010

ENVIRO-NEWS: EPA Releases Second Phase of Toxicity Testing Data for Eight Oil Dispersants

For what it's worth, here are the WPA study results on dispersants used in the BP oil disaster. I can't say it will do anything for the damage that has been done or BP will be any more liable for there neglagance.
In my opinion, BP is a foreign entity that has done nothing short of an act of covert terrorism against the people of the United States. The suffering from which will be realized for generations.
AP

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Makuch, Joseph" <Joseph.Makuch@ars.usda.gov>
Date: Aug 2, 2010 1:56 PM
Subject: [ENVIRO-NEWS] EPA Releases Second Phase of Toxicity Testing Data for Eight Oil Dispersants
To: <Enviro-News@ars.usda.gov>

From: U.S. EPA [mailto:usaepa@govdelivery.com]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 1:25 PM
Subject: Emergency Response News Release (HQ): EPA Releases Second Phase
of Toxicity Testing Data for Eight Oil Dispersants

CONTACT:
EPA Press Office
press@epa.gov
202-564-6794

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Aug. 2, 2010


EPA Releases Second Phase of Toxicity Testing Data for Eight Oil
Dispersants

WASHINGTON -The US Environmental Protection Agency today released peer
reviewed results from the second phase of its independent toxicity
testing on mixtures of eight oil dispersants with Louisiana Sweet Crude
Oil. EPA conducted the tests as part of an effort to ensure that EPA
decisions remain grounded in the best available science and data.

EPA's results indicate that the eight dispersants tested have similar
toxicities to one another when mixed with Louisiana Sweet Crude Oil.
These results confirm that the dispersant used in response to the oil
spill in the gulf, Corexit 9500A, when mixed with oil, is generally no
more or less toxic than mixtures with the other available alternatives.
The results also indicate that dispersant-oil mixtures are generally no
more toxic to the aquatic test species than oil alone.

"EPA has committed to following the science at every stage of this
response - that's why we required BP to launch a rigorous dispersant
monitoring program, why we directed BP to analyze potential alternatives
and why EPA undertook this independent analysis of dispersant products,"
said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. "We have said all along that the
use of dispersant presents environmental tradeoffs, which is why we took
steps to ensure other response efforts were prioritized above dispersant
use and to dramatically cut dispersant use. Dispersant use virtually
ended when the cap was placed on the well and its use dropped 72 percent
from peak volumes following the joint EPA-U.S. Coast Guard directive to
BP in late May."

The standard acute toxicity tests were conducted on juvenile shrimp and
small fish that are found in the gulf and are commonly used in toxicity
testing. The tests were conducted on mixtures of Louisiana Sweet Crude
Oil and eight different dispersant products found on the National
Contingency Plan Product Schedule - Dispersit SPC 1000, Nokomis 3-F4,
Nokomis 3-AA, ZI-400, SAFRON Gold, Sea Brat #4, Corexit 9500 A and JD
2000. The same eight dispersants were used during EPA's first round of
independent toxicity testing.

All eight dispersants were found to be less toxic than the
dispersant-oil mixture to both test species. Louisiana Sweet Crude Oil
was more toxic to mysid shrimp than the eight dispersants when tested
alone. Oil alone had similar toxicity to mysid shrimp as the
dispersant-oil mixtures, with exception of the mixture of Nokomis 3-AA
and oil, which was found to be more toxic than oil.

While there has been virtually no dispersant use since the well was
capped on July 15 - only 200 gallons total applied on July 19 - EPA's
environmental monitoring continues.

EPA required rigorous, ongoing monitoring as a condition of authorizing
BP's use of dispersant in the gulf. Dispersants prevent some oil from
impacting sensitive areas along the gulf coast. EPA's position has been
that BP should use as little dispersant as necessary and, on May 23,
Administrator Jackson and then-federal on-scene coordinator Rear Admiral
Mary Landry directed BP to reduce dispersant usage by 75 percent from
peak usage. EPA and the Coast Guard formalized that order in a directive
to BP on May 26.

Before directing BP to ramp down dispersant use, EPA directed BP to
analyze potential alternative dispersants for toxicity and
effectiveness. BP reported to EPA that they were unable to find a
dispersant that is less toxic than Corexit 9500, the product then in
use. Following that, EPA began its own scientific testing of eight
dispersant products.

EPA released the first round of data - on the dispersant products alone
- on June 30. Today's results represent the second and final stage of
the independent acute toxicity tests.

View the toxicity test results: http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/dispersants


R263

[deletions]

***********************************************
Enviro-News is a service of the Water Quality
Information Center at the National Agricultural
Library.  The center's Web site is at
http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/.

The Enviro-News list facilitates information exchange.
Inclusion of an item in Enviro-News does not imply
United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) agreement,
nor does USDA attest to the accuracy or completeness of
the item. See
http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic/environews.shtml#disclaimer
You can contact the list owner at
owner-Enviro-News@ars.usda.gov.
***********************************************